◎ Discry Score
clickup.com
productivity · API
B
0 / 100
DISCOVERY0
COMPREHENSION0
Category leader: 92 (A)
Discry your API →
PRODUCTIVITY · RANK #9 OF 24

ClickUp is Good to agents.

Discry independently scored how well an AI agent can discover and understand the ClickUp API from what’s public — not whether it’s usable. Below: every signal we checked, what’s costing the score, and what to change.

Discry your API — freeView the docs ↗

SCORED UNDER RUBRIC 1.2 · A full re-launch under Discry Score 2.5 — a new behavioral instrument, not comparable to these scores — is in progress.

Discovery

45% of score · 76/100
OpenAPI specA machine-readable OpenAPI/Swagger spec agents can parse.Pass
llms.txtAn llms.txt index that points agents to the docs that matter.Pass
llms.txt qualityThe llms.txt is focused, current, and well under the size budget.Pass
llms-full.txtA full-text bundle agents can load in one request.Fail
AGENTS.mdAn AGENTS.md that tells coding agents how to build on the API.Fail
.well-known/mcp.jsonA discoverable MCP manifest at a well-known path.Fail
MCP registryThe API is listed in a public MCP registry.Pass
robots.txt AI directivesrobots.txt allows (or explicitly guides) AI crawlers.Pass
SitemapA sitemap so agents can enumerate the docs surface.Pass

Comprehension

55% of score · 78/100
Task-oriented descriptionsEndpoints described by what they accomplish, not just their shape.Partial
Realistic examplesRunnable, real-world request/response examples.Pass
Multi-step workflowsDocs that chain calls into complete jobs an agent can follow.Partial
Error-recovery guidanceDocumented failure modes and how to recover from them.Partial
Answer-first formatThe answer leads; preamble does not bury it.Pass
Capability boundariesClear limits — what the API can and cannot do.Pass
Naming consistencyConsistent, predictable naming across endpoints.Pass
Heading hierarchyClean heading structure agents can navigate.Pass
Markdown docsDocs available as clean markdown, not JS-rendered HTML only.Pass
Token efficiencyDocs are concise enough to fit an agent context window.Partial

What we found

  • An agent landing on the docs is explicitly invited in: every page carries a 'For AI agents: visit /llms.txt' banner and a top-of-page pointer to the Markdown documentation index — ClickUp is one of the few APIs actively signposting agents.
  • Clean Markdown is available for the entire site: any doc or reference page can be fetched as `.md` (e.g. /reference/createtask.md), and each reference page embeds the full OpenAPI definition for that operation — near-ideal for LLM consumption.
  • Both OpenAPI specs are public and live: V2 (508KB JSON) and V3 (131KB) both return 200 with import instructions for Postman — an agent can generate a typed client with zero scraping.
  • The biggest discovery gap is AGENTS.md: no AGENTS.md exists in ClickUp's GitHub org, so a coding agent working in a repo gets no first-party setup context (the community fills this with third-party MCP servers and CLIs instead).
  • Comprehension is solid but uneven: rendered guide pages (Get Tasks, OAuth flow) are richly task-oriented, while raw OpenAPI summaries ('Create a new task.') and many parameter descriptions are terse or empty — an agent gets good context from guides but thin context from the spec alone.

What to change

Prioritized by impact on discoverability. You (or your docs platform) deploy these — Discry never touches your API.

  1. 01Publish an AGENTS.md in the primary public GitHub repo (and link it from the docs) so coding agents get first-party auth, base-URL, and rate-limit context — the single highest-leverage discovery fix from a current fail.
  2. 02Add a llms-full.txt (ReadMe supports it) so an agent can ingest core API capabilities in one fetch instead of following the llms.txt index page-by-page — this would lift token efficiency from partial to pass.
  3. 03Enrich OpenAPI-level descriptions: give every endpoint a one-line task-oriented summary ('Create a task in a List, optionally with assignees, custom fields, and due dates') and fill the many empty parameter `description` fields, so the spec is self-sufficient for agents that read it directly.
  4. 04Make error recovery explicit: on the Common Errors and Rate Limits pages, add an actionable 'how to fix' step for the top errors (e.g. 'On 429, back off using the Retry-After / X-RateLimit-Reset header') rather than only stating the cause.
  5. 05Serve a .well-known/mcp.json pointing at ClickUp's official MCP server so agents can auto-discover the hosted MCP without reading a setup doc.

Execution coverage · INFORMATIONAL, UNSCORED

Whether an agent can actually complete a call and recover from errors is the deeper Audit layer — documented here, but not part of the Discry Score.

Personal API TokenOAuth 2.0 (authorization code) Error format documented Rate limits documented Pagination documented Idempotency documented

Auth (personal token + OAuth2), rate limits (per-plan tiers, 429 handling), and pagination (100/page, dedicated comments-pagination guide) are all clearly documented. Errors are returned as JSON with named codes and a dedicated Common Errors page. Idempotency keys are not documented.

See your own Discry Score.

Drop your API docs URL. See what an agent sees — in 60 seconds, free.

Discry your API — free